Her physician recommended an epidural steroid injection to reduce Lynn’s pain. Lynn wants to refuse medical treatment. Lynn would rather put up with the intense, stabbing pain than undergo the procedure, however she is unsure if she can or should do so. She is wondering:
The legal precedent: Janiak v. Ippolito, 
After an accident, a plaintiff has a legal duty to mitigate his/her losses and to take steps in order to ensure the limitation of damages suffered as a result of the defendant’s wrongful conduct.
In order to accomplish this, plaintiffs may have to submit to surgery or other treatment in order to alleviate his/her condition. If the plaintiff refuses to do so, a court can decide that any subsequent worsening of his or her condition is the plaintiff’s fault, and decide not to award them damages.
However, the Supreme Court of Canada case Janiak v. Ippolito has proven that in some cases full damages can still be awarded to a plaintiff who has declined recommended medical treatment. In short, Janiak, the plaintiff in this case, refused to submit to spinal surgery, because his medical doctor could not assure him of a 100% chance of success and recovery. The initial trial resulted in a finding that the refusal of treatment was unreasonable and that there were no damages due, as a result of this refusal. The plaintiff appealed and the Ontario Court of Appeal reversed the situation and came up with a damage figure that took into account that, as per the medical doctor’s estimation, recovery was only guaranteed by 70%. The Supreme Court of Canada agreed with the Court of Appeal’s approach to damages.
Patients have the right to refuse medical treatment
In Canada, patients who are 19 years of age or older and capable of decision making must give consent for health care providers to treat illnesses and injuries. Even if treatments have begun, patients can refuse or even withdraw consent for care.
To ensure that patient consent is free and informed, health care providers must inform patients about their conditions, treatment options, expected treatment outcomes and the risks of treatment or non-treatment. Patients must voluntarily consent to medical treatment and not feel pressured to accept or refuse the proposed treatments. Treatment providers must accept a patient’s decision, even if denying treatment could harm a patient’s health.
If patients have contagious diseases that could harm the public at large, health care providers do not need consent to medical treatment. Individuals with communicable diseases like tuberculosis, syphilis and AIDS/HIV may be placed in isolation so they do not infect others. They may be required to take medication, partake in treatment and undergo testing to monitor their conditions.
Refusing medical treatment has consequences
As our fictional plaintiff Lynn has experienced, refusing medical care can lead to poorer health. Not only has Lynn’s low back pain worsened, but she is still unable to work.
Even though Lynn had the right to refuse medical treatment, it was unwise for her to do so. Her health suffered and she cannot work. Since she failed to mitigate, she probably will not be able to recover her lost wages and future earnings.
There is nothing more important than your health and wellbeing. If you are seeking medical treatment after an accident or if you are considering refusing the course of treatment your healthcare provider recommends, contact the legal team at Mackesy Smye. Our experienced team of legal experts can guide you through the medical process so you receive medical care that suits you and brings you back to health.
Contact us for a complimentary, confidential consultation. You may fill in this secure online contact form or simply call us at 1-905-525-2341 today.
If you’re injured by a third party, what rights do you have? Can you sue for pain and suffering as you would in an auto accident? It’s different for both off-road vehicles and watercraft. In this article, we explain the differences and also give some great advice for staying safe off-road and on the water.Read Article
Proving medical malpractice can be difficult but in cases where a family doctor was negligent in administering healthcare, victims should have their case heard by the courts. Read this post to better understand a family doctor’s duty of care and what constitutes medical malpractice.Read Article
If you or a loved one has suffered a traumatic brain injury while under the care of a medical professional, you need to determine if malpractice occurred. This article offers an in-depth look at Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBI) - click to read more.Read Article
Surgical negligence is not to be taken lightly. We trust medical professionals to take care of us and adequately warn us of risks and complications. We expect them to operate on the correct area of our bodies, and with equipment that is in working order. We trust surgeons with our lives. Read this post to learn more.Read Article
Whether you have suffered a spinal injury as a result of a car accident, an accident at home or another cause, the impact on your and your family’s life can be devastating. When the injury occurs at the hands of a medical professional, it can be particularly devastating. Read this post to learn more.Read Article
If you have sustained injuries or other complications after medical treatment and you have reason to believe that the facility or doctor played a role in your injuries, you may have a case and will need an expert medical negligence lawyer to help. Read this article to learn about the lawsuit litigation process, and know what to expect.Read Article