Ontario Human Rights Code Explained

Picture of family - Ontario Human Rights Code

Ontario Human Rights Codes – Provincial counterpart to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

In 1962, Ontario formalized the Ontario Human Rights Code. The Code serves to ensure that the basic human rights of all Ontarians, including the equality, dignity and worth of every human and the right to equal opportunity are protected. Federally-regulated industries, such as telecommunications or banking, meanwhile, are regulated by the Canadian Human Rights Act. The Ontario Human Rights Code stands to ensurethat no one in employment, housing or other sectors, can discriminate based on the following protected grounds, among others:

  • Age
  • Race or Ethnic Origin
  • Citizenship or Place of Origin
  • Disability
  • Family or Marital Status
  • Gender Identity or Gender Expression
  • Sex; or
  • Sexual Orientation.

What this means, in short, is that if you have experienced discrimination due to any of the above factors by an individual or group under the jurisdiction of the Code, your human rights may have been breached, while could empower you to bring a civil claim, or a claim under the Code to the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal.

If you have decided that some legal action is in order, you must first decide which legal route you would like to take. Decisions in both avenues are made on a case by case basis, and therefore hard and fast rules do not apply. But one major difference is that in actions taken to the OHRT, the plaintiff is able to ask for a public interest remedy, or remedy for future compliance, either instead of or in addition to monetary compensation. This means that the Tribunal, if they find in your favour, is able to order remedies be put in place that would prevent future harm or be in the general interest to the public, such as developing new policies and procedures, implementing training programs, or any other initiative the Tribunal believes will improve sensitivity and decrease discrimination.

Civil suits lack the ability to secure public interest remedies, but may provide for higher monetary compensation through general damages, special damages, awarded for actual financial losses and expenses, as well as other headings of damages, legal costs, and interest.

If you feel you could use the assistance of legal experts to help you make this important decision and guide you through the process, contact Mackesy Smye today.

Related Articles

Elderly Woman Gets Examined - General Law

Expectation Damages vs Consequential Damages

As has been previously covered in this blog, damages refer to the monetary compensation awarded to victims of an injury or loss caused by another person. Such damages are remedial in nature, in that they attempt to restore the injured party, in as much as possible, to the position they were in before the accident.

Read Article
General Law Related Understanding Tort Law

Understanding Tort Law

The word “Tort” has its origins in the Latin “tortus” which means “crooked” or “wrong”. In Canada’s legal system, Tort law has an important place. Tort laws have been created by judges over the years. The primary purpose is not to punish the accused, but to provide compensation for losses or damages.

Read Article
Truck rollover - commercial trucking anti-rollover

Anti-Rollover Technology - Commercial Trucking

When it comes to legislating safety standards on the road, perhaps no area is more important than for commercial semis and trucks. Considering that the average commercial truck can be 12 feet tall, 80 feet long, and almost 70 tons in weight, the impact of accidents involving trucks can be severe.

Read Article
Lawyers in courthouse - civil suit vs criminal trial

Civil Suit vs Criminal Trial

When someone has been harmed, whether physically or psychologically, by another individual or group of individuals, the criminal justice system is often the first refuge for victims. However, due to the high burden of evidence required, as well as exploitation of loopholes in the law, criminal charges are not always pressed against your attacker.

Read Article
Lawyer at trial - dishonesty during discovery examination

Dishonesty during Discovery Examinations

A recent court decision out of Alberta has stressed the importance of adhering to the oath taken prior to commencing an examination for discovery and giving the inquiring party truthful answers.

Read Article
Templates Library
Loading, Please wait...
The Library cannot be open, please try it again later.
This field is required.
Invalid email format.
Some of the fields are not filled or invalid.
Form Template
Select a Form Template
Available fields in the selected template: