Criminal charges may not always be brought against a suspect. In some cases, a wrongdoer even be charged, but found not guilty, or otherwise not criminally responsible after a criminal trial. As a victim, this could leave you wondering what your options are, and in the right situation a civil claim may be appropriate to consider.
One of the main differences between a criminal or civil trial is the burden of proof in each. In a criminal trial, the Crown must prove the elements of an offence beyond a reasonable doubt. In a civil claim, the burden of proof is lessened, as the plaintiff must prove their case on the balance of probabilities. This means that the victim’s case must only be seen to be more likely than the defendant’s, rather than beyond a reasonable doubt, as in a criminal case, which is a much harder standard to meet.
This holds true whether or not the accused/defendant has been charged criminally, has been acquitted, or has been convicted. Perhaps the highest profile illustration of the difference in the burdens of proof in a criminal trial as opposed to in a civil claim took place in the United States, when a civil court determined that O.J. Simpson was legally responsible for the death of his wife, despite having been found innocent in a controversial criminal case two years earlier. In Ontario, similar outcomes are possible under the law. If it is found that you did suffer injury, losses or other damage because of the actions or inactions of a defendant, regardless of whether they were criminally charged or convicted, you may be eligible for general, special and/or punitive damages. The amount you could be awarded would depend factors such as the extent of the harm caused, any future expenses that are anticipated, your loss of income, and any conduct of the defendant that may expose them to punitive damages.
With a free personal injury consultation with the legal team of Mackesy Smye, you can learn the best option for your case, so call us at 1-905-525-2341 or contact us through our secure online contact form.
As has been previously covered in this blog, damages refer to the monetary compensation awarded to victims of an injury or loss caused by another person. Such damages are remedial in nature, in that they attempt to restore the injured party, in as much as possible, to the position they were in before the accident.Read Article
The word “Tort” has its origins in the Latin “tortus” which means “crooked” or “wrong”. In Canada’s legal system, Tort law has an important place. Tort laws have been created by judges over the years. The primary purpose is not to punish the accused, but to provide compensation for losses or damages.Read Article
When it comes to legislating safety standards on the road, perhaps no area is more important than for commercial semis and trucks. Considering that the average commercial truck can be 12 feet tall, 80 feet long, and almost 70 tons in weight, the impact of accidents involving trucks can be severe.Read Article
Ontario Human Rights Codes - Provincial counterpart to the Canadian Charter of Rights and FreedomsRead Article
A recent court decision out of Alberta has stressed the importance of adhering to the oath taken prior to commencing an examination for discovery and giving the inquiring party truthful answers.Read Article